Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 8981 - 9000 of 18,118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2015, 3:37 pm
Barry Bonds wins again.He lost in the district court, which was fine with his conviction after a jury trial for obstruction of justice. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
A recent article by Justice David M. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:52 pm by sgottlieb
Ct. 2304, 2313 (2013) (Kagan, dissenting); Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
  It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:47 am by Carissa Byrne Hessick
But then, rather than deciding the case, the Justices set the case for re-argument and asked the parties to brief whether a portion of the ACCA is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
 Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More food for… [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
 This conference will examine the ways in which exclusivity on a patent can be extended for the longest term, such as re-patenting, data exclusivity, paediatric exclusivity and regulatory extensions. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 8:15 am by SHG
It is tailor-made to ensure that public figures do not have to be worried about New York Times v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Expressive content of photos can be entirely unaltered—Dillon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
In short, these amici tend to acknowledge that the Court to which they are making their plea is not the Court that in 1986 issued Bowers v. [read post]