Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8981 - 9000 of 21,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2014, 5:11 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
The complaint sought to hold the individual defendants liable for all of FAC’s and MCS’s alleged UDAAP violations as “covered persons” under Dodd-Frank. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 5:02 am by Jon Hyman
… Defendants stress the alleged religious purpose served by the Buffet and its ability to provide low-cost meals. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 6:31 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
The defendant must have owed the plaintiff a duty of care, the defendant must have violated the duty of care, and the plaintiff’s injury or death must have been a direct result of the defendants carelessness. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:44 am by Tobin Admin
The trial court concluded that the insurance company was still liable to make the payments under the agreement. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:01 pm
Federal court is typically more costly to plaintiffs than state court and, for this reason, favored by corporate defendants. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:52 am by Ben Vernia
This settlement also resolves allegations that the defendants’ parent company, Allied Capital Corporation, is liable for the acts of its subsidiaries. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  Instead, in simple terms, the FCA is about holding organizations liable when they lie to the government in order to receive undue (or unduly large) payments. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 11:06 am
"It's no defense to say, 'We didn't know.'" Under product-liability law, one company often can be held 100% liable for all damages awarded to all consumers, regardless of its market share or the amount of tainted product it might have sold. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 8:48 pm by Jessica Mendelson
Ultimately, the court found the evidence suggested CAI was simply asserting in “good faith, an arguable interpretation of existing law” which did not make the company liable for tortious interference or blacklisting. [read post]
24 May 2008, 7:00 am
   The rationale of the one bite rule was that domestic animals by definition were not injurious, and therefore liability could be predicated only on the defendant's knowledge that a particular animal had a propensity to behave in manner that was injurious to humans. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:13 pm by Travis Crabtree
The last tip comes directly from Professor Goldman’s post:  “If you are an online business defending a secondary trademark claim, never treat contributory trademark claims lightly. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am by JONATHAN DAVIES AND ELLIOT GOLD
Conversely, where the chief wished to defend such an action, he might consider it necessary to call the LQC as a witness to give evidence at the employment tribunal, who would then have to be cross-examined by the (possibly dismissed and so now ex-) officer’s counsel. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   The defendants moved to dismiss the FDIC‘s ordinary negligence claims against them, relying on several prior decisions in failed bank cases in the Northern District of Georgia that bank directors cannot be held liable for ordinary negligence under Georgia’s business judgment rule. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:26 am by Stanley D. Baum
As to this question, the Court said that a complaint states a plausible claim for relief if, taking the plaintiff's factual allegations as true, its factual content allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
This would seem to mean that a claim against a defendant potentially liable for 99% of all damages at the domicile of a co-defendant potentially liable for the remaining 1% will be allowed under the Brussels Regulation. [read post]