Search for: "Nation v. Nation" Results 8981 - 9000 of 56,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2010, 6:16 am by Simon Chester
That day, I felt myself to be the embodiment of African nationalism, the inheritor of Africa’s difficult but noble past and her uncertain future. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:39 am by Bill Marler
Marler Clark, The Food Safety Law Firm, is the nation’s leading law firm representing victims of Shigella outbreaks. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:46 am
  Although the United States pretty well rejected database protection in the Supreme Court’s Feist v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Kralowec, “Dukes and Common Proof in California Class Actions,” 21 Competition 9, 11-12 (Summer 2012); Brief for Amicus Curiae National Employment Lawyers Association in Support of Appellees' Petition for Panel Rehearing, Wang v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:31 am by NCC Staff
Holder and Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm by Maribeth Meluch
McKinney,  involving a longstanding legal battle against the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:37 am by Anna Christensen
On Monday, the Court clarified a key point of immigration law, holding in Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 12:31 am
By Eric Goldman National Numismatic Certification, LLC. v. eBay, Inc., 2008 WL 2704404 (M.D. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 12:27 am
As we mull over a possible national shield law and in the wake of the Apple v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 6:36 pm
My friend Neena (who also clerked for the Hawk) works at the National Women's Law Center. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:58 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
This appeal considers whether that approach was wrong in light of Werhof v Freeway Traffic Systems GmbH & Co KG (C-499/04). [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:25 am by Aimee Denholm
On the question of jurisdiction, it was held that Sala v SSHD [2016] UKUT 411 had rightly been overruled by the Court of Appeal in a subsequent decision on the interpretation of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1003), reg 26. [read post]