Search for: "STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA! " Results 8981 - 9000 of 9,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2008, 7:38 pm
Over at BLT, Tony Mauro has a great report up on the argument in Preston v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:33 pm
The officer gave up his pursuit after fearing he might have blown his cover. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:29 pm
Today I was in the Palo Alto, California Apple store. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:02 pm
Yes, lawyers must be passionate about the process and the rights they are defending because they are defending these rights for everyone else who may one day stand accused. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 12:18 pm
The only reason for this I can come up with is that there as an offer made under California Code of Civil Procedure 998. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 11:17 am
One of the issues that the Supreme Court will confront when it takes up the case at a hearing is whether Davis had a right to sue — that is, whether he had “standing. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
., GlaxoSmithKline and Mitsubishi Chemical Corp. file patent infringement lawsuit to stop Barr Laboratories from producing a generic version of the anti-blood clotting drug: (IP Law360), Biaxin (Clarithromycin) - Court holds in Abbott Labs v Sandoz that use of Markush group language in the specification does not necessarily limit construction of claim terms: (Chicago IP Litigation),Coreg / Dilatrend / Eucardic (Carvedilol) - Teva Pharmaceutical Industries… [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 4:59 pm
 The court, however, divided a bit on the issue as to whether justices make up their minds on important points during oral argument. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:47 am by Sean Hayes
., a nonprofit research firm in Santa Monica, California. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 7:00 pm
  We're standing by to provide your client referrals with exceptional legal services. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 6:43 am
"Stand up paddle surfing represents the majority of my surfing now," he says. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 4:24 am
District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 4:01 am
Following Panel Opinion Holding that District Court did not Clearly Err in Finding UPS Violated Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by Refusing to Hire Deaf Drivers but that Defense was Correct that Class Action Judgment Based on Violation of California's Unruh Act Must be Reversed, Ninth Circuit En Banc Overrules Prior Ninth Circuit Authority and Remands Class Action for Further Proceedings on ADA Claim Plaintiff filed a putative class action in… [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 8:46 am
Following up on this story, I found Hays published some of the Assignment documents online. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 8:33 am
Drivers could face fines of up to $100.The California minimum wage will increase by 50 cents to $8 per hour. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 8:59 am
Lubarsky, the California litigator who writes this blog, admits to a bit of writer's block lately, but vows to pick up the pace of his postings. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 8:55 am
The "ix" in its name stands for "information exchange. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 4:13 am
Is there a way to set it up so that I don't have to pay the idiotic $800 California fee? [read post]