Search for: "State v. Little"
Results 8981 - 9000
of 23,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
., dismissed the claim of copyright infringement, stating that even if Pyrrha Design owned the copyright in the designs, Plum & Posey did not infringe it.The main questions raised by the Court in this case are the following:Does copyright subsist in any of the Pyrrha Designs because they are original artistic works? [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
We discussed Fields v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 9:30 am
Such a case was dealt with in R. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 11:15 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:08 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:54 pm
NSAJewel v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:57 pm
With United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
In Hart v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 1:30 pm
Little known is the relationship between the last two and how they had evolved. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 1:30 pm
Little known is the relationship between the last two and how they had evolved. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:01 pm
Supreme Court Precedent — Eldred v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:56 am
The exceedingly long decision of the court in Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:19 am
Basically everything about the courts gets a little more expensive and everybody has to work a little harder.That said, Grits [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:29 am
There’s very little in all the Brandeis scholarship out there about his inner life. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 5:36 am
That might be coming down the pike, but it’s not the holding of the opinion in Wilson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:30 pm
But what she means is a little different. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:05 am
Black and Latino students are likely to walk in with little or no test preparation. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:46 am
The privilege predated this nation, and was explained 180 years ago by the United States Supreme Court in Stein v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
-Gary V. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 8:18 pm
Affirming in United States v. [read post]