Search for: "United States v. California" Results 8981 - 9000 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2019, 9:00 am by Steven Cohen
Bridge Charleston Investments E LLC et al – United States District Court – District of South Carolina – April 12th, 2019) involves an injury involving an elevator. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  This decision out the United States District Court for the Southern District of California becomes one in a growing series of court decisions decertifying automatic meal period deduction class actions due to the lack of common proof. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:24 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “President Trump stood next to President Vladimir V. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:27 am by Amy L. Peck and Michael H. Neifach
” The purpose of the wind down period was to give the beneficiaries some time to prepare to leave the country or seek some other status in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Heasley).Non-ownership: Opposer claimed that the mark was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, a California corporation, and therefore that JY Insyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
But Chief Judge Roberts has previously voted against government interference in the marketplace of idea in cases like Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by NCC Staff
United States, and decided that Gordon Hirabayashi, a college student, was guilty of violating a curfew order. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am by Amy Howe
United States came on a list of orders released on Wednesday morning. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:44 am by Eugene Volokh
  Section 425.16, subdivision (b)(1), states: “A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person’s right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will… [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Howell Williams, Western Connecticut State University, “Workers Built Danbury: Deindustrialized Memory in a Hatting Town”Josh Kluever, Binghamton University (SUNY), “Sorry Waldman, We Just Couldn’t Help It: Socialist State Legislators in New York, 1912-1922”CARCERAL STATE, CARCERAL SOCIETYModerator: Elizabeth Hinton, Yale University Panelists: Max Felker-Kantor, Ball State University, “Arresting the Demand for Drugs: DARE… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am by Nathaniel Sobel
United States (holding that the use of a thermal imager to detect heat radiating from home was a search), United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm by John Elwood
State Bar of California and Lathrop v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:23 pm by oolbrych
It also requires companies to provide details on how asbestos-containing materials are used and/or processed in the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]