Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 8981 - 9000
of 60,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2015, 10:44 am
Their work will likely have an important impact on the Federal Circuit’s upcoming Lexmark decision. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:34 pm
Prior to Marathon Entertainment v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Canadian Council for Refugees v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
In Elane Photography LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 8:00 am
Last week, Maryland's Court of Appeals-- the state's highest court-- heard oral arguments in Neustadter v. [read post]
4 Jan 2005, 5:13 am
In Microdecisions v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:12 am
Hearing officer recommends dismissal of employee who submitting a false affidavit claiming she was unemployedNYC Human Resources Administration v Johnson, OATH Index #1187/10OATH Administrative Law Judge Kevin Casey recommended that the Human Resources Administration terminate Alyce Johnson, an eligibility specialist employed by New York City, after finding that Johnson had falsified affidavits submitted to the New York City Housing Authority stating that she was unemployed and… [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:36 am
In Painter v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:25 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:49 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:44 am
In Gordon v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
Professor Kaminski is a Research Scholar at Yale as well as the Executive Director of the Yale Information Society Project–we have been lucky to feature her insights on United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2005, 5:13 am
In Microdecisions v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:59 pm
I am still working on a comment on the substantive aspects of today's Supreme Court decision in Hall v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Sharon v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:07 am
The employer would not countenance a return by the Appellant to court-going duties, but neither was it prepared to allow her to continue working on restricted duties. [read post]
6 May 2016, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
