Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 11,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2010, 8:45 am
Some guidance is available from England: the recent decision in the case of SAS v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:07 am
An early example of the Great British double entendre Zoe Renault v Renault Zoe. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:20 am
Alternative feminist judgment: R v A (No 2) [2001] UKHL 25 – guardian.co.uk: This ‘alternative’ judgment is part of the new Feminist Judgments Project, an interesting attempt by academics, practitioners and activists to produce 23 alternative feminist judgments to a series of key cases in English law. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:22 pm
There have been a number of posts about the Jameel jurisdiction to strike out/stay and a number of recent decisions Ronaldo v Telegraph [2010] EWHC 2710 (QB) and Mardas v v New York Times Co [2009] EMLR 8. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:01 am
The "plain English" translation by... [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:51 am
Distinguishing the House of Lords decision in Denny-Mott and Dixon v James Fraser and Co, the judge held that the contract between the Club and IRISL was to provide indemnity insurance and that "[p]art of that purpose remained lawful. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Furthermore, the result of the decision in Thornton v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:08 am
See DeJames v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am
In February this year, the English courts appeared finally to have woken up to the arrival of the Rome II Regulation, with the first published decision addressing its provisions. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:32 pm
Not surprisingly, my Plain English inbox was filled this week with questions about Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm
The decision in another authority on this issue, R (on the application of Comninos) v Bedford Borough Council [2003] EWHC 121 (Admin), turned on whether it was an abuse of process for a local authority to indemnify its officers in order to enable them to take libel proceedings. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:05 am
But it does not follow that for an English court to test the jurisdiction of a Paris tribunal in an international commercial arbitration by reference to the transnational rule which a French court would apply is a case of renvoi. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:53 am
In a recent decision of the UK Supreme Court, a similar view appears to have been taken in the context of enforcement of awards: Dallah Real Estate v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 4:27 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:30 pm
@marshallk MapCrunch is beautiful, like StumbleUpon for Google Street View all around the world http://www.mapcrunch.com/ in reply to marshallk # On Arizona v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:53 am
Each week at Wise Law Blog, we review decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.R. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:25 am
v=2TEia3QZ1ec&feature=player_embedded [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 6:45 am
In the case of Sugar Hut Group Ltd & Ors v Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) Plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 2636 (Comm) Mr Justice Burton reaffirmed the English Court's approach to non-disclosure and breach of warranty.The defendants provided insurance cover to the claimants in respect of four nightclubs. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
These are all areas in which the present English law of libel falls down. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:32 am
Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Co v Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan [2010] UKSC 46; [2010] WLR (D) 279 “When an English court was asked to enforce a foreign arbitration award made against a non-signatory to the contract containing the arbitration clause, whom the arbitral tribunal had determined had been a party to the contract, the court would, if the enforcement claim was challenged, determine anew the question as to whether or not the… [read post]
