Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 9001 - 9020 of 21,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by blackfin
Under the doctrine of assumption of risk, a defendant is protected from lawsuits where a plaintiff’s voluntary involvement in an activity requires accepting a level of risks and hazards. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by blackfin
Under the doctrine of assumption of risk, a defendant is protected from lawsuits where a plaintiff’s voluntary involvement in an activity requires accepting a level of risks and hazards. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by blackfin
Under the doctrine of assumption of risk, a defendant is protected from lawsuits where a plaintiff’s voluntary involvement in an activity requires accepting a level of risks and hazards. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:11 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
The defendant(s) in this case is (are) a general practitioner(s). [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:11 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
There the case was submitted to the jury on the theory that the terrazzo floor was peculiarly liable to become slipper when wet by water and that defendant should have taken precautions against said risk. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
If you find that defendant has complied with that standard of care he/she is not liable to the plaintiff, regardless of the result. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 11:19 am by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
The driver saw the other defendants car’s headlights in the distance traveling toward them in the opposite lane, but she thought that she had enough time to turn. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 11:19 am by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
The driver saw the other defendants car’s headlights in the distance traveling toward them in the opposite lane, but she thought that she had enough time to turn. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:31 am
BonetzkyIn May, 2012, defendant-appellant Paula Bonetzky (“Tenant”) and Tecumseh Landing, LLC (“Landlord”) entered into a one year lease agreement for the lease of a portion of real estate in Huntsville, OH. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:17 am by Docket Navigator
§ 285, but denied defendant's motion to hold plaintiffs' counsel jointly and severally liable for those fees. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:39 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
As a result, the creator of the dangerous situation would be liable for the victim’s injuries as well as the rescuer’s injuries. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:39 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
As a result, the creator of the dangerous situation would be liable for the victim’s injuries as well as the rescuer’s injuries. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:24 am by Joy Waltemath
[See Court adopts new FLSA joint employer test, finds general contractor and sub jointly liable for overtime]. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
The judge may decline an award, however, if the defendants original offer “was not made in good faith. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 11:05 am by Kirk Jenkins
” The clinic’s website stated that all clinic doctors had faculty status at the defendant hospital’s school of medicine. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:24 am by Docket Navigator
Following summary judgment of noninfringement and post-judgment discovery regarding plaintiff's real party in interest, the court granted defendant's motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:07 am by Wes Anderson
Initial interest confusion is a theoretical “subset” of trademark infringement, whereby infringement can occur “where a plaintiff can demonstrate that a consumer was confused by a defendants conduct at the time of interest in a product or service, even if that initial confusion is corrected by the time of purchase. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 10:49 am by Paul Willetts
Successor employers will become liable for the full duration of an employee's tenure unless they expressly opt outMr. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Kirk Jenkins
Is there any theory pursuant to which the officers, pledge board members or even the fraternity itself might be liable to the young man’s estate in tort? [read post]