Search for: "Long v State"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 45,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
The United States Attorney’s Office also stated that it planned to 'use the video of the [en banc] argument as a training tool to reinforce the principle that all Assistant U.S. [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:16 am
In the case of Schade v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 10:35 am
In Crawford, William v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:13 pm
R. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
We discuss this alternate view on pp. 396-397 of Part III: We acknowledge that there is, and has been, a long-standing, alternate, minority view—the Impeachment Clause only requires the remedy of removal for the three expressly-listed classes of positions: "[1] The President, [2] Vice President and [3] all civil Officers of the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 6:16 pm
Pfaff v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
In this respect, the Court recalls its case-law to the effect that a Contracting State is considered to retain Convention liability in respect of treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force of the Convention (see, for example, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 126-128, ECHR 2010-…). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:36 am
" Cummings v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Supreme Court struck down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act last year in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:32 pm
In Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
But did you know that many states have their own mini-WARN acts? [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:42 am
Tags: eat drink and be merry, nanny state, public health Related posts The “pie chart that doesn’t want you to eat pie. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:32 pm
In Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:34 am
In Houser v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:58 pm
This practice has a long history in the legal profession, but it can result in confusion as to who wrote what, and sometimes that matters.Volokh has been trying to get the Supreme Court to say that the requirement that jury verdicts be unanimous is a constitutional requirement, overruling Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 2:00 pm
Exxon Mobil, in its latest appeal, said the Louisiana state court failed to follow the strictures set down in the Philip Morris case. [read post]
