Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9001 - 9020
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
David provided his list: Complaints from clients that they don’t hear from their lawyer Fees are too high Matters take too long I provided mine: Staff supervision without micromanagement. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
” As Jordan Eth and Mark R.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 9:08 pm
That would give you immediate rights in the States, even if you haven’t used the mark yet in the States. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:21 am
Doesn’t that feel better? [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
As a rule of thumb, if the authorities are slow off the mark, you may be going to court as late as 7-8 months after the incident. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
As a rule of thumb, if the authorities are slow off the mark, you may be going to court as late as 7-8 months after the incident. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
As a rule of thumb, if the authorities are slow off the mark, you may be going to court as late as 7-8 months after the incident. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:19 am
It’s the settlor’s inept that matters, not Sally’s. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:11 am
As a factual matter, this result is also an artifact of the case’s procedural history—the court only considered the parties’ factual submissions and didn’t review the text of Arthur Conan Doyle’s actual canonical writings. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 4:12 pm
No matter what you call it, if you don’t have health insurance and don’t otherwise meet certain provisions, you’ll have to cough up either 1% of your taxable income or a flat fee of $95 per uninsured adult and $47.50 per child (up to $285 for a family) per month, whichever amount is higher. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:56 am
The State Department called both Arnold and me on a matter of some importance. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:25 am
The terms: ____ In the matter of Sen v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Edward T. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
As a rule of thumb, if the authorities are slow off the mark, you may be going to court as late as 7-8 months after the incident. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
As a rule of thumb, if the authorities are slow off the mark, you may be going to court as late as 7-8 months after the incident. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
As a rule of thumb, if the authorities are slow off the mark, you may be going to court as late as 7-8 months after the incident. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:13 am
Of course the plaintiff’s mark wasn’t famous. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:21 am
The opinion isn’t clear whether the link is a paid ad or organic result, but it shouldn’t matter in the slightest—whatever trademark use is, this ain’t it.) [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:08 pm
Ah, and that was the other big takeaway from Marty’s talk for me, the trademark-registration skeptic – also something I knew, sure, but wasn’t really articulating clearly even to myself: Even if you’re really a dog, on the Internet trademark registrations matter a lot. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 6:48 am
[TTABlogged here].In its District of Columbia decision, the Board observed that "[t]he remedy that applicant seeks is a matter that might be addressed legislatively, but we have no authority to change the words of the statute." [read post]
