Search for: "North v. State" Results 9001 - 9020 of 13,331
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2013, 1:25 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Supreme Court Rules Against Routine Warrantless Blood Tests in DUI Cases: The Supreme Court ruled in our favor in Missouri v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:38 am by Leslie Sammis
McNeil in courtroom 1, and in Division "V" are heard by The Honorable Dick Greco, Jr., in courtroom 2 at 301 North Michigan Ave., Plant City, FL 33563.What is a violence injunction? [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:47 am by Susan Brenner
In doing so, the Court stated that, `a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:31 am by Ryan Scoville
The North Atlantic Treaty is a paradox: it seeks to deter conflicts by requiring member states to act when one of their own invokes Article V. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:10 pm by John W. Arden
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH Unfair Trade Practices Law.The federal district court in New York City declined to enjoin food distributor Kangadis Food Inc. from selling refined olive oil labeled as "100% Pure Olive Oil" (North American Olive Oil Association v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court (Prince v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
Facts: The parties married in 2009 in their home state of North Carolina, where all of their extended family members live. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Image from hereThe weekly review starts with a post by Gopika on the UK Supreme Court decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Limited v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Why we look in the logical place, of course – the decisions of that particular state’s courts and federal decisions in the district and appellate courts responsible for that state. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:11 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
  Indeed they are, due to the Supreme Court’s holding in Marquette Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:44 am by Florian Mueller
The ruling was published yesterday (in Dutch), the same day that a German court gave short shrift to a Nokia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:21 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)In his pun-filled, 10-page decision in Lee v. [read post]