Search for: "People v Johns" Results 9001 - 9020 of 9,055
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
(image size) (three plates printed on one sheet) edition of 75 $ 1,800 unframedContact the Gallery to OrderDavid Blackwood's depictions of the life, the landscape, and the people of Newfoundland have produced, over the past four decades, a body of work which holds a special place in the Canadian imagination. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 7:16 pm
He chose a position between the liberal Democrats and George Wallace, supporting Brown v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
What follows is a compendium of substantive analyses on some of the key issues of the War on Terror by the authors here at Balkinization.The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Civil Liberties, the War on Terror and Presidential PowerPart I-- Civil LibertiesPart II-- Presidential Power and Constitutional StructurePart III-- Torture and the "Torture Memos"Part IV- The NSA Controversy and Government SurveillancePart V-- HamdanPart VI-- The Military Commissions Act of… [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 12:11 am
John Smith NASSAU COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant Granted Trial Order of Dismissal; Prosecutor's Information Fails to Name 'Victim' People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 10:14 am
Ogletree, Jr., All Deliberate Speed: Reflections on the First Half-Century of Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 11:39 am
John Battelle calls search engine logs the "database of intentions," and lots of people would like to know more about searchers' intentions—including law enforcement or the government thirsty to know more about its citizens. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
But some people are more difficult to find than others. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:48 pm
Demner, The Nuclear Terrorism Convention: Will Detainees Be Classified as "Enemy Combatants" by the United States Harvard Law Review, Volume 120, Number 1, November 2006 Neal Kumar Katyal, Hamdan v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:00 pm
A staunch advocate of John Stuart Mill's harm principle, [15],[16] there is no need to govern the specific food an individual consumes. [read post]