Search for: "People v. Herring"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 23,564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2014, 5:13 pm
The first challenge to a photo ID law to reach the Supreme Court—Crawford v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:22 am
Litman’s “three paragraph” test is silly and disingenuous, though people seize upon whatever they can to make their pitch, particularly when it’s made to people who haven’t a clue about how ridiculous the argument is. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
In People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
In People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 2:55 pm
[PennEast v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:51 pm
Schering-Plough and Reaffirmed in Peoples v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 10:56 am
The case Acumen Law Corporation v Ojanen, 2019 BCSC 1352 (CanLII) tells the story of the abrupt and acrimonious end of an articling student’s employment with a law firm. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:01 am
Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justice McLachlin spoke a few hours ago at the Canadian Institute for Administration of Justice (CIAJ) conference in Saskatoon, with her comments focused on barriers to access to justice, especially cultural barriers faced by Aboriginal people. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:00 am
The question arose in the case of Getup Ltd. v Electoral Commissioner [2010] FCA 869, whether this signature could be electronic, and if so, what kind of e-signature would be satisfactory. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:10 am
The style of the case is Ruben and Anita Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:05 am
For various reasons, people come and go. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:53 am
In his majority opinion in National Labor Relations Board V. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 4:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:03 am
Griffin for the loss of her husband’s society and companionship, not as compensation to [Mr.] [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:29 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
Counsel also learns that the experts will also disclose any active threats by the interviewee to kill people, on the ground that if they fail to do so, there's liability under Tarasoff.Counsel doesn't like that, and thinks that everything should be confidential. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Bruce Springsteen v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 9:05 am
In fact, the next day's New York Post reported that at the arraignment, the People had provided information that another girl had come forward claiming Barbour seduced her seven years earlier, when she was 13. [read post]
