Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2018, 3:44 pm
However, both 8 CFR 214.2(l)(3)(iii) and 8 CFR 214.2(l)(3)(v)(B) state that the employment abroad must have occurred prior to the filing of the petition. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
“As early as 1872, the [United States Supreme] Court recognized that it was ‘a general principle of the highest importance to the proper administration of justice that a judicial officer, in exercising the authority vested in him, [should] be free to act upon his own convictions, without apprehension of personal consequences to himself. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
As a lawyer, she was probably best known for arguing United Church of Christ v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
See Cert Petition in Henry v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Cisco Systems, Inc., 13-896; while the cross-petition Cisco Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
CONTROL SOLUTIONS, INC., UNITED PHOSPHORUS, INC. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am
United States, 16-7806. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), and United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 2:46 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:33 am
United States Dep't of Agriculture, 673 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:48 am
A recent decision by the United States Supreme Court was directly on point. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
On November 9, 2007, Schwab also filed a Petition to StayExecution in the United States Supreme Court in light of theCourt's grant of certiorari in Baze v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
United States, 18-7833 Issues: (1) Whether a post-2002 conviction for sale of cocaine or possession of cocaine with intent to sell in violation [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s new decision in Medtronic v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm
Halleck (Feb. 25): Whether the private operator of a public-access television channel is a “state actor” – that is, someone who is acting on behalf of the government — who can therefore be sued for violations of the First Amendment United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:02 pm
In the Matter of Renee Morrell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm
(Save Our Carmel River v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
For example, the Eastern District of Texas, which covers a largely rural portion of Texas, emerged as a focal point for patent litigation in the United States. [read post]
