Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 9001 - 9020 of 13,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2018, 9:12 am by Scott Bomboy
United States, the question was about the ability of the police to use probable cause to search a motor vehicle when its driver appears to have committed a non-moving parking infraction. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
  KL Gates has a fine post in its Electronic Discovery Law Blog about a recent case, United Factory Furniture Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:44 pm by Frances Rogers
  Amicus Curiae briefs were filed by the State of California, the California State Association of Counties, and the California Special Districts Association. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:25 am
Superior Court of California, Solano Cty., 480 U.S. 102 (1987); Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.V. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/289052.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Supreme Court Bond v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:36 am
” Judge O’Rourke also found no evidence of unconscionability, viewing the written consent clause as a simple application of California contract law, which states a contract cannot be modified without the consent of all parties. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:35 pm
" In 1993, the constitutionality of this law was challenged by motorcycle enthusiasts in the case of Buhl v Hannigan. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:35 am by HRWatchdog
Just weeks after the United States Supreme Court confirmed in an 8-1 decision that a plaintiff whose individual claims are compelled to arbitration loses standing to serve as a PAGA plaintiff on behalf of other employees’ claims, the California Supreme Court granted review in Adolph v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Orin Kerr
In a recent post here at Lawfare, April Doss argues that the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]