Search for: "State v House"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 28,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 11:48 am
In that case, Koch v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 11:24 am
H.R.1865 Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017 2. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 11:19 am
People v Stone, 463 Mich 558, 563 (2001). [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 11:08 am
Stitt, No. 17-765 and United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 10:52 am
Sorry to point out the obvious, but this guilty plea came even before the President signed FOSTA and was based on a state crime (money laundering) that had been available to state AGs all along without requiring any modification to Section 230. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Buchanan was a five-time member of the House of Representatives, the secretary of state under President James Polk, and the U.S. minister to Great Britain. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
Though Section 230 itself says nothing about neutrality, some cases do discuss it, beginning with the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:45 am
Cameron Russell (Center for Law & Information Policy, Fordham Law School) likened the legal developments in U.S. music licensing to building additions to a house. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 3:40 am
The architect claimed in fact that both modifications made to his social housing project ‘Casa Bosco’ and the transformation of the project into a for-profit enterprise indeed infringed his moral right of integrity.The decisionThe Court began its analysis by noting that Article 20(2) of the Act also states that [the translation from Italian is mine] “in works of architecture the author cannot object to any modifications that were necessary in the course of… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:00 am
Mattis, the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 6:04 am
And there’s a good reason for that: “legislative vetoes” and other conditional authorizations that try to circumvent the normal legislative process are generally seen as unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm
Matthew Kahn shared the Supreme Court’s per curiam ruling declaring the U.S. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:13 am
No facts in the affidavit supported this virtually unlimited search of Osejo’s Facebook account. * United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:55 am
In Eda Ema, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 8:18 am
House of Representatives. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
The soon-to-be-released independent film Little Pink House dramatizes the story behind Kelo v. [read post]
