Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 22,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2008, 1:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:37 am
Supreme Court decided Roper v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 5:13 pm
That’s the new rule according to State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:43 pm
However, an important exception is noted in the recent case of Samantha C. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce reiterated and expanded upon its earlier objections that the rule would greatly burden companies and auditors. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 8:23 am
Rascal House, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:54 am
” [1] Conservatorship of Geerdes v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:47 am
It also modifies the injunction that entered after the district court found that the hiring tests have had a disparate impact on black applicants.The case is United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:09 am
Supreme Court ruled in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:10 pm
" (Linton v Nawaz, 14 NY3d at 821.) [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:52 am
The plaintiff organization (CTPU) sued the State of Connecticut over the state's standards regarding the racial composition of its interdistrict magnet schools. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:24 am
All of this is filtered through a natural bias toward upholding convictions, resulting in a legal objection that is difficult to apply and a claim on appeal that seems unlikely to prevail.Yesterday's unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 2:12 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:06 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
See Atwell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:09 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:18 am
Walling v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:29 pm
See King v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
The European Court of Human Rights has issued a ruling (Othman (Abu Qatada) v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
This contrasts to the burden of persuasion under Title VII, which allows plaintiffs to state a claim based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, by showing this characteristic was “a motivating factor” for the adverse employment action. [read post]
