Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 9001 - 9020
of 15,310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2013, 2:30 pm
Filed: April 16, 2013Opinion by Judge Catherine C. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:50 pm
Finally, the Court upheld the performance claims (section 74.01(1)(b)) and administrative monetary penalty (section 74.1(1)(c)) provisions of the Competition Act under sections 2(b) (freedom of expression) and 11 of the Charter. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:55 pm
In addition, the ICO states that it expects site operators to have appropriate internal policies in place to deal with: (a) complaints from individuals who believe that their personal data may have been processed unfairly or unlawfully because of derogatory, threatening or abusive third-party posts, (b) disputes between individuals regarding the factual accuracy of posts; and (c) complaints about how the organization processes personal data provided by users. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:32 am
In particular, the rule needs to be assessed in light of (a) calls for legislative reform from the Manitoba Law Reform Commission, (b) the European Union’s adoption of the Rome II Regulation for choice of law in non-contractual obligations, (c) the ongoing operation of a competing rule under Quebec’s civil law and (d) the application of the rule by Canadian courts since 1994. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 5:51 am
” Dinova v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:03 pm
The purpose of former Vehicle and Traffic Law § 510(2)(b)(v) was "to continue State eligibility for the full amount of federal highway funds" by complying with 23 USC § 159. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:54 am
The Ninth Circuit appeal, Joffe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 3:35 am
For that answer, we must look to § 1028(d)(7)'s introductory paragraph, as well as the examples provided in subsections (A) through (C). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:50 pm
Circuit filed a per curiam order granting the government’s motion to stay the district court’s July 11, 2013 order in Hatim v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:38 pm
The court concluded that “[b]ecause the overwhelming-community-of-interest standard is based on some of the Board’s prior precedents, has been approved by the District of Columbia Circuit [in Blue Man Vegas, LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:22 pm
In East Sussex Children Services v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:06 am
In Vujicevic v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:32 am
Morgan v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 am
In Bernal v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:58 am
C.12, s. 20(1). [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 5:35 am
Baby Trend, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:02 pm
Supreme Court affirmed the state supreme court's judgment by a vote of 5-4. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:47 am
The bankruptcy court received substantial briefing on the BAP’s published decision in Tsurukawa v. [read post]
