Search for: "State v. Childs" Results 9001 - 9020 of 18,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Father argues that unless a recipient is a resident of the State of Missouri or another state, the recipient is not eligible for child support services. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
Agent Luders was able to download "video and image files" from the board that contained child pornography, but because Japan's "child pornography laws are different than those of the United States" he was not able to get a search warrant for user logs "that would have enabled the Government to identify users who" had downloaded child pornography form the Ranchi site. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
 The 6th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
The Fourth Department stated that the Family Court only has power which is explicitly conferred on it by statute. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:58 am by Susan Brenner
Deprospero, 932 N.Y.S.2d 789 (Supreme Court of New York – Appellate Division 2011), and it began in “2008 and early 2009” when an undercover New York State Police investigator was investigating individuals who were sharing child pornography online via peer-to-peer file-sharing networks: A certain IP address was a download candidate for suspected child pornography files over 40 times between February 18 and March 3, 2009, and the investigator confirmed… [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:12 am
  The document also stated Kilgore's agreement to "reimburse Custodian for any reasonable expenditures required for the proper care of said Child. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:13 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United Debt Holdings, LLC (Debt Collection; Tribal Exhaustion) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlState in Interest of M.D. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:56 am
Police officer removed from his position following is conviction of a crime involving conduct in violation of his oath of officeMatter of Feola v Carroll, 2008 NY Slip Op 04948, Decided on June 5, 2008, Court of AppealsCity of New Rochelle police officer Donald Feola, was terminated from his position pursuant to Section 30.1(e) of the Public Officers Law following his conviction of convicted of violating Penal Law § 260.10(1) -- endangering the welfare of a child. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:05 am
The recent decision by the supremes in Forest Grove Sch Dist v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 7:36 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
As the country's attention turns to next week's oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the Prop 8 case and the ACLU's challenge to DOMA in United States v. [read post]