Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 43,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2008, 10:58 am
United States of America v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm
She concluded that because the benefit is attending the game (despite the Reds’ current record), both parties to the ticket sale are getting a benefit. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
" After admitting various exhibits, the trial court stated, Until I sign it and it gets entered, it is not effective unless there is some announcement on the record or something else that makes it a final judgment. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:36 pm
We therefore conclude, based upon the record before us, that " a hearing should be held to promote justice [because] the issues raised by the motion are sufficiently unusual and suggest searching investigation' " (People v Ausserau, 77 AD2d 152, 155, quoting People v Crimmins, 38 NY2d 407, 416; see People v Kearney, 78 AD3d 1329; People v Nicholson, 222 AD2d 1055, 1057). [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Following the case of Giles v Rhind (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 118 (“Giles v Rhind”), Mr Justice Jay found that s 32(2) LA 1980 should be interpreted more widely, so as to cover “legal wrongdoing of any kind, giving rise to a right of action”. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 6:43 am
Retamco Operating, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 9:36 am
Wood, Nov. 3, 2015, Maine Supreme Judicial Court More Blog Entries: State Farm v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:17 am
Additional Resources: Gemmink v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 8:53 am
In the recent case of Symonds v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:06 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:10 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:13 am
Marks v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:22 am
” Simcox v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 7:21 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:10 am
School Dist. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2011 NY Slip Op 02604, Appellate Division, Fourth Department The significant issue in this action: Should Supreme Court have granted North Syracuse Central School District’s petition seeking a “writ of prohibition” barring the New York State Division of Human Rights from taking further action on a complaint alleging unlawful discrimination filed with it.* The Appellate Division decided that Supreme… [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:06 am
Defect in Jury Charge - Trejo v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 2:11 am
Indus. v. [read post]
