Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 9001 - 9020 of 9,844
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: European Court of Justice raises bar for famous brand owners wishing to prove dilution: Intel Corporation v CPM United Kingdom (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Class 46) RPX Corporation – Defensive patent aggregation club (Securing Innovation) (Patent Fools) (Patent Prospector) (Techdirt) (IAM)… [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:05 pm
  It was aimed at states and local government units that had a history of discriminating against minority voters. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 2:11 am
Even so, M.D. is being confined civilly for actions for which, according to this State's criminal code, and United States Supreme Court precedent, he cannot be punished criminally. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:11 pm
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has released an opinion disposing of summary judgment motions on a claim that a minority shareholder's sale of shares is a breach of fiduciary duties where that sale destroys the corporation's subchapter S tax status. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 3:01 pm
The Reporters stated that manufacturing defects should continue to be decided under a strict liability regime, but they proposed a radical new concept for design defect cases based on what they claimed was the majority rule in the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:57 am
Co. v Graham, 275 AD2d 1012, 1013; see generally Thrasher v United States Liab. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 2:06 am
There are instructive parallels, he argues, between the imperialism of "old Europe" (not his phrase) and that of Japan, and of the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:30 pm
They want out of Iraq and are eager for the U.S. to share the burdens with allies. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:48 am
NRDC, No. 07–1239 (S.Ct., November 12, 2008) Secretary of the Navy Winter, right, and Admiral Gary Roughead depart the Supreme Court of the United States after Oral Arguments on October 8, 2008. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:44 am
  The Ohio Supreme court tackled that issue a year ago in State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19]  This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20]  While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of the FPGPA is to accomplish… [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 2:09 pm
  During the next two weeks, I hope to explore some of these issues with you, many of which are implicated by the current economic crisis in the United States. [read post]