Search for: "United States v. Robert"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 9,865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2007, 9:36 am
And yesterday's trial court opinion continues this -- paragraph 73 cites Dague v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:59 pm
And maybe he is.But it was John Roberts, no fan of my clients, who wrote this a couple of years ago in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am
United States Marines only ever voice this sentiment with power and precision. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Since the mid-1970s, he has been deeply pessimistic about the possibilities of political change: Political action of any sort, he believes, cannot improve or ameliorate the condition of black people in the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Congress responded by prohibiting the transfer or release of Guantánamo detainees to the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:23 pm
” On the other side of the balance, the judge noted the government’s interest in detaining those who “actually pose an immediate threat to the national security of the United States during ongoing international conflict” and ensuring [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm
But why do such figures, whether in the United States or other democracies, rarely get close to the highest levels of power? [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Its single complaint about the interim map, that it fails to consider state requirements that county boundaries be respected, has long been rejected as a matter of both Voting Rights Act and constitutional (Gray v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
Now it’s possible to look at when people stopped saying “the United States are” and said “the United States is” by copying the contents of an entire library: a nonexpressive use. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:17 am
The CRS cites several cases where the production of business records was at issue, and Flynn’s attorneys named a more-recent Supreme Court decision in their letter to Senate investigators, United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
The decision represents an early response by a federal trial judge to a question the United States Supreme Court left open in last month’s decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:35 pm
Bellotti (1978), set the legal-ideological stage for SCOTUS’s landmark decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
The decision represents an early response by a federal trial judge to a question the United States Supreme Court left open in last month’s decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:41 pm
United Artists Corp. (1968) and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 3:52 am
This means understanding how the United States Sentencing Manual works alongside corresponding case precedent (e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But his list would be a remarkable beginning: (1) Eliminate gerrymandered Congressional districts (which could be done with lawsuits); (2) End the Senate’s dysfunctional filibuster rules (which should have been done earlier, but Democrats got suckered again by Republicans); (3) Adjust corrupt lobbying laws that now unduly favor former members of Congress working for special interests; (4) Aggressively test and re-test the Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling (Democrats… [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
