Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 60,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2015, 11:37 am
This was what was alleged in the recent case of Perez v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 12:16 pm
Secretary of State, CBCA No. 5683, 20-1 BCA ¶ 37,589. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 3:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
Happy post-Thanksgiving.I don't know how many people actually work the day after Thanksgiving. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 8:00 pm
For example, in LHSC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
On September 13, 2018, in Electric Power Supply Association v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
On September 13, 2018, in Electric Power Supply Association v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
In a related analysis, the Second Circuit addressed Section 109 of the Copyright Act and held that the first sale doctrine, which allows a person who buys a legally produced copyrighted work to sell or otherwise dispose of the work as he sees fit, does not apply to works manufactured outside of the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 6:58 am
It might not work in others. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 8:58 am
” In re Marks v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
This 55-page opinion from the Ninth Circuit tells you probably more than you would ever want to know about soybean farming (and cotton farming) in the United States -- and, in particular, (1) how we get rid of weeds in modern farming, and (2) just how dependent we are on both (a) Round-Up and its follow-on chemicals (here, dicamba) and (b) genetically modified seeds that protect crops against such chemicals. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
An occupational disease is "a disease resulting from the nature of [the] employment and contracted therein" (Workers' Compensation Law § 2 [15]), and "does not derive from a specific condition peculiar to an employee's place of work, nor from an environmental condition specific to the place of work" (Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d 1252, 1252-1253 [2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Mack… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
An occupational disease is "a disease resulting from the nature of [the] employment and contracted therein" (Workers' Compensation Law § 2 [15]), and "does not derive from a specific condition peculiar to an employee's place of work, nor from an environmental condition specific to the place of work" (Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d 1252, 1252-1253 [2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Mack… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:51 am
(See also, Reilly v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:00 pm
Plaintiffs are the companies' claims adjusters, who seek damages based on overtime work for which they allege they were not properly paid. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
University v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
University v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:46 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:27 am
The admissibility of breathalyzer evidence in Massachusetts DUI cases may depend upon how the courts apply the United States Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
