Search for: "Childs v. State"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 21,043
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2015, 2:05 pm
Gonzalez, 262 AD2d 281; Silver v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
Had that been the case, the New York State and United States legislatures would have added language providing for such exceptions. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 5:17 am
Dyke v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
OCSE also contends that the plaintiff request for cancelled checks should be denied because the information sought is confidential and precluded from release to third parties pursuant to Social Service Law §111- v(1) and 42 USCS §654. 42 USCS § 654 provides, in pertinent part, that: A State plan for child and spousal support must—(26) have in effect safeguards, applicable to all confidential information handled by the State agency, that are… [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:39 am
MOSKOVITZ V. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:43 am
In Gwiazdowski v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:13 am
Cameron Mathieson, a deceased child (by his father Craig Mathieson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 26 March 2015. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:23 am
However, the employee’s defamation claim failed as a matter of law (Mattiaccio v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
Nola Spice Designs, LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:12 pm
Citing to the Sixth Circuit’s 2011 decision in Stansberry v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:05 pm
Davis”), appellant, appeals a judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County which affirmed the decision of an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) in a case in which the Maryland State Department of Education Office of Child Care (the “Office of Child Care”), appellee, denied Ms. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm
The charge arose out of appellant’s alleged failure to attend the Somerset County Non-Custodial Parent Employment Program (“SCNPEP”), a government-run program designed to help non-custodial parents find and maintain employment in order to meet their child support obligations. ... [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm
As the California Supreme Court explained in Collection Bureau of San Jose v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:14 am
Trade Commn. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:08 am
See, e.g., Troxel v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
Look to the Islamic State group and the almost routine videos of beheadings available online. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In an old California case from 1970, Keeler v. [read post]
