Search for: "In re R. F."
Results 9021 - 9040
of 10,009
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
Moore, 541 F.3d 1323, 1330 (11th Cir. 2008)). [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:47 am
They’re all showing up in stores and in restaurants, which is perfectly legal because the Americans With Disabilities Act (A.D.A.) requires that service animals be allowed wherever their owners want to go. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 3:24 am
Goord, 554 F.3d 216, 228 (2d Cir. 2009) (holding that a six-month lapse between the dismissal of a plaintiff's lawsuit and an allegedly retaliatory beating by a police officer who was a defendant in the suit supported an inference of causation because "[i]t is plausible that the officers waited to exact their retaliation at an opportune time").This case allows retaliation plaintiffs to overcome the presumption that, without direct evidence of retaliatory intent… [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
" [Applicant Chippendales already owns an incontestable, Section 2(f) registration for the same mark; it was seeking to establish inherent distinctiveness this time around.] [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 7:23 pm
-Sidney F. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
La Présidente se félicite que l'application stricte des critères de brevetabilité ait conduit à plus de rejets (+42% par rapport à 2007 !). [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 7:37 am
f. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:27 am
First, we're grateful to Paul Stephan, the Lewis F. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:41 pm
The program is set to currently operating under a continuing resolution (CR) with re-authorization due for re-upping on March 20. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:22 pm
Imagine what kind of explosion in investment and innovation we could achieve in nanotechnology with the competition we're proposing today. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:29 am
Wright, 392 F.3d 1269, 1276 (11th Cir. 2004)). [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:15 am
Now it’s months away from being wound down, and they’re still paying to retain talent? [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:28 am
See In re Baycol Prods. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:30 pm
"[I]f we make arrests or issue citations," he said, "we're taking them to the court. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 10:38 am
Reuters: President Obama has told the Treasury secretary Timothy F. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:57 am
R. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 11:32 pm
Megan F. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 10:01 pm
You can watch it here or get it from M&F as a DVD.UK (or is that DigiBrit?) [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 7:27 pm
They’re considered living expenses and treated the same as meals for any other employed person, meaning that they’re not deductible. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 1:13 pm
"And earlier last week, Obama himself said that: "[I]f we are keeping focused on all the fundamentally sound aspects of our economy, all the outstanding companies, workers, all the innovation and dynamism in this economy, then we're going to get through this. [read post]
