Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 9,146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2007, 3:18 am
Does that make since now? [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 9:37 pm
What does that mean? [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 8:48 pm
(TTABlogged here).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 5:06 am
For practitioners in particular, it does not therefore seem to be of much use as a "get out of jail" card for patent applications that would otherwise be within one or more of the excluded areas.On another note, the CIPA Journal for January 2007 has now arrived. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 11:22 am
; Dawn Johnsen, formerly of the Clinton Administration (most likely to have her torture authorized by John Yoo?) [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 8:12 pm
1. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 6:16 pm
They claimed that they misunderstood the requirements of Section 1(a), did not understand the legal meaning of "use in commerce," and "honestly believed that their ownership of the same mark in Australia and their use in commerce of such mark in Australia justified their Section 1(a) filing in the U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 2:55 pm
University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 73, pp. 1-64, Fall 2004. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:26 pm
Does that include the possibility of a nuclear strike? [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 9:00 am
There is no charge for this event.Tuesday, February 27, 2007, 5:00-7:00 P.M.Fundraising reception for John Edwards for President. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 8:14 am
In your opinion, does it bode well for the future of the Court that neither of the two new justices spent any extended time in academia? [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 2:15 pm
Maybe I'm the one out on the limb, but a little birdie tells me that the seeds of an opposition or two have been planted here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:31 am
Yet, Justice Breyer is apparently now the more enthusiastic anti-patent of the two; they are the only members of the Court in this century to have taken the view that the open door to § 101 patent-eligibility for “living” inventions in the Chakrabarty case should be narrowed, arguing in a dissent in J.E.M. that the utility patent law “does not apply to plants”.(1) Just last year, an anti-patent drumbeat manifested in the Breyer dissent from… [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 11:20 am
" is, and the building does not have a visible address. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 10:21 am
My January 20, 2007 post "What Does Exclusive Mean To You? [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 5:14 pm
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 4:06 pm
John M. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 6:23 am
The appropriateness of praise or blame does not mean that moral evaluation should be based only on the client's own moral projects. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:15 pm
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
More specifically: (1) Exhaustion need not be pled and demonstrated in the complaint; rather, failure to exhaust is an affirmative defense [read post]
