Search for: "L. Good" Results 9021 - 9040 of 18,620
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
And it is unclear from the statute whether the “good motives” defense is satisfied when at least one of the speaker’s motives is good, only when all of the speaker’s motives are good, or when the good motive predominates (whatever that might mean). [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm by Malik W. Ahmad
Homestead: (l) The homestead as provided for by law, including a homestead for which allodial title has been established and not relinquished and for which a waiver executed pursuant to NRS 115.010 is not applicable. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm by Malik W. Ahmad
Homestead: (l) The homestead as provided for by law, including a homestead for which allodial title has been established and not relinquished and for which a waiver executed pursuant to NRS 115.010 is not applicable. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm by Bill
O'l Bill Clinton went one better. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:27 am by Larry
Int'l Trade 1983). [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:41 am
Moreover, consumers are likely to believe that applicant's goods contains saffron. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 3:08 am
Here, the flags are not being displayed as flags but instead appear as torsos of individuals, signifying the international nature of applicant's goods and services.And so the Board reversed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here;Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:43 pm by Daniel Cappetta
Despite having a strong defense to the more serious charges, the Commonwealth still appears to have a good case against Miles for possession. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The court added that “the absence of a service requirement from exclusion L demonstrates that the parties did not intend for ‘filing’ or ‘commencement’ of litigation in exclusion L to depend upon service of process. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 5:56 am
And so the Board did not err in presuming that the involved goods travel in the same channels of trade to the same classes of consumers.Finally, with regard to a third-party registration for the mark HOLLISTER CALIFORNIA & Design, which depicts a bird in silhouette (below), the Board correctly concluded that the probative value of this registration was limited given the lack of evidence of actual usage of the mark.Read comments and post your comment here;Text Copyright John L. [read post]