Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 21,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2017, 5:38 am
The lawsuit was brought by the daughter of a woman who died six years ago while under the defendant’s care at a rehabilitation center. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 5:04 am
” The jury charge submitted over the agent’s objection sought to have the jury determine whether the insurer had a duty to defend due to the “misconduct” of the agent, without defining what it meant by misconduct, or without first having the jury determine that the agent herself was liable to the insured, before addressing the insurer’s vicariously liability for the agent’s actions. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Phillips which required him to leave the couple’s home. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
TNL’s success in that appeal meant that publications up until a certain date were Reynolds privileged but there remained a small number of the publications for which TNL was liable. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:29 pm
However, the key cause for the settlement was undoubtedly the court’s finding that Peters would be personally liable for contributory and vicarious infringement if the jury found substantial similarity between Prelude and the other Axanar works and Star Trek. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 12:00 pm
Defendants filed a joint motion for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiff’s claim was barred by the Snow and Ice Removal Act. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:49 am
The trial court ruled in pre-trial motions that the police were not grossly negligent in firing their guns at the shooter, nor were the nightclub defendants liable for actions prior to the shooting. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:49 am
The trial court ruled in pre-trial motions that the police were not grossly negligent in firing their guns at the shooter, nor were the nightclub defendants liable for actions prior to the shooting. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:37 am
TNL’s success in that appeal meant that publications up until a certain date were Reynolds privileged but there remained a small number of the publications for which TNL was liable. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Ozerdinc Family Trust et al v Gowling et al, 2017 ONSC 6 [2] The Defendants have admitted that the Defendant Mark Siegel fell below the standard of care of a reasonably prudent tax lawyer in regards to some of the Plaintiff’s allegations and the Defendant Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP is liable for the acts or omissions of the Defendant, Mark Siegel. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 4:23 pm
It’s important to point out tax filers or preparers are not liable for honest mistakes. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:20 pm
Loblaws, Inc) the Plaintiff fell and injured her knee and back while shopping at the Defendant’s store in 2010. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:36 am
Two weeks after the filing of the first lawsuit, Long filed a second lawsuit against a different doctor she claimed was liable for her father’s death. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:36 am
Two weeks after the filing of the first lawsuit, Long filed a second lawsuit against a different doctor she claimed was liable for her father’s death. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
(A written notice is better than a phone call, because having written documentation may make it easier to defend against an eviction later on or to prove a claim for damages.) 1. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 8:07 am
In March 2016, the district court granted defendants’ request for summary judgment and found in favor of the defendants, which included the Battle Creek Police Department (BCPD) and the three officers involved in the fatal shooting. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
Vermeuele's Law's Abnegation is written with style and verve. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:26 am
In order to hold a defendant liable in a medical malpractice claim, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant owed them a duty of care. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:26 am
In order to hold a defendant liable in a medical malpractice claim, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant owed them a duty of care. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 10:26 am
The test looks at whether the defendant’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff harm. [read post]
