Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2008, 10:58 pm
(The following post is contributed by Venugopal Mahapatra and Gautam Bhatia)The case of Great Offshore Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:10 am
By Cori Badgley In City of Palmdale v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
The panel concluded that the inmate was unlikely to succeed on the merits (and therefore was not entitled to preliminary relief) “in light of a decision from this court, Supre v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
The factual background in Starglade Properties v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:22 pm
In January, Lindsay had the privilege of arguing before the United States Supreme Court -- in her first oral argument ever. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:12 pm
Policy, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 5:10 pm
Makeig v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
United States and Florida v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
Aug. 27, 2019) is among the first cases to consider Auer deference in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in Kisor v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
Commuters Unite! [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 10:53 am
The panel also stated that in light of its disposition of Emmis’s petition for panel rehearing, Emmis’s petition for rehearing en banc is dismissed as moot. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:58 pm
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Austin Raynor, who took up the cause on behalf of the United States, embraced the justices’ suggestion that Section 231g was his ally. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
The framework proposal is the product of a long process of engagement and thought that seeks to realign policy in light of the consequences of financialization and what is now fashionably described as "hyperglobalization" (the later term a judgment around the continuing development of the logic of globalization as it shift power over macro-economic policy from states elsewhere). [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Commenting on the Supreme Court’s controversial rulings on the extent to which the Constitution applied in the territories the United States acquired in the wake of the Spanish-American War, Finley Peter Dunne famously had his character Mr. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
Section 108(a)’s Statute Of Limitations Extension Only Applies To Trustees And Debtors-In-Possession The Fifth Circuit case, United States for Use of American Bank v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:53 pm
Dep’t of Justice, to All United States Attorneys (Oct. 19, 2009). [read post]
