Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 9021 - 9040
of 21,697
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2016, 8:58 am
Broward County and EEOC v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Professor Mark Lemley’s brief on behalf of Newegg asks that the attorney-fee framework of Octane Fitness actually be implemented. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:10 am
United States. [read post]
17 May 2016, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:57 pm
” See Kernan v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:39 am
This is probably why some municipalities require supermarkets to put price stickers on consumer goods.The case is Poughkeepsie Supermarkets v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 5:06 am
Shire City Herbals, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
According to the French IP code, M&S was not entitled to demand the cancellation of those goods and services not cited against it by ISMS, and therefore the claims for cancellation should be accepted as far as they apply to those goods and services cited in the infringement claim but rejected for those not so cited.On the validity of CTM 5410998 SIMPLYRecognizing the need to consider the validity of the marks by reference to the average consumer in all EU member states,… [read post]
16 May 2016, 7:16 pm
In State v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:07 pm
Four Justices dissented in Burwell v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:23 pm
For the reasons stated in Judge Manion’s partial dissent, 799 F. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:22 pm
State v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 11:55 am
But as Mark Twain once said, “[f]acts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:33 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:58 am
That's another one of my question marks. [read post]
14 May 2016, 1:01 am
On this day in history, Lord Mansfield of the King’s Bench in England issued a ruling in the case of Somerset v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 12:48 pm
’State v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm
One need only reflect on the fact that more than 1,000 qui tam actions for false marking were filed by opportunistic plaintiffs following the 2009 Federal Circuit decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:11 am
Parks, LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:13 am
Nevertheless, one decision over the past few years, Cellairis v. [read post]
