Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 9021 - 9040 of 16,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2013, 5:18 pm
No matter what safety devices are in place, they can only be effective when drivers are responsible and paying attention to both vehicles and pedestrians. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:11 pm by T. Greg Doucette
It was a small miracle when the judge announced he’d just gotten sworn in the preceding Monday and wasn’t comfortable deciding the issue himself, so he continued the matter a month to set it in front of a different judge. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 9:30 pm by Jeff Gamso
“We alert fellow Muslims in Somalia that some festivities to mark Christian Days will take place around the world in this week,” said Sheikh Ali Dhere during the press conference, adding: “It is prohibited to celebrate those days in this country. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 8:11 am by Guest Blogger
Legal Stud. 93, 100 (1981) and into the 21st century, for example Mark A. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:15 pm by Wells Bennett
But I think part of what’s been interesting about this whole exercise is recognizing that in a virtual world, some of these boundaries don’t matter anymore. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:23 am by Ron Coleman
 It reads exactly like a planted post, doesn’t it? [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:10 am by Terry Hart
The appeal marks the first time that a Circuit Court will be looking at the same issue as Bridgeport, (although at least one other federal district court and a state court have) a 2005 decision from the 6th Circuit that attracted considerable attention for its holding that digital samples are not analyzed under the substantial similarity test like other copyrighted subject matter. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 12:49 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Mark Alexander at Property 118 for always giving me a heads up. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:19 am by Ron Coleman
 But hasn’t the Board, really, essentially granted a franchise to Zyrtec in ZYR as a trademark all its own, a family name that no one else can use no matter how unconfusingly? [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
  With the Court of Public Opinion becoming ever more influential in legal matters, this Kat wonders if the real loser in IP disputes that are fought on the web instead of in court or in private settlement discussions is the value of maintaining a robust trade mark protection strategy. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:29 pm by Jonathan Bailey
It doesn’t matter if the mistake was by a staffer writing on your behalf, an innocent error you made yourself or something worse. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:39 pm by Wells Bennett
Mark Martins, points out that all this comes after—and assumes—relevance, which still isn’t clear to his side. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 11:30 am
, here, the IPKat raised an issue concerning OHIM practice which appeared to contravene Article 38(7) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation. [read post]