Search for: "Office of Hearing and Appeals"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 23,859
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
On appeal, the employee argued that the judge had not considered the evidence that related his 2003 industrial injury to his life activities after a 2009 hearing decision. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 8:33 am
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which was hearing an appeal of the Federal District Court decision that there was a performance right under California law, decided to turn to the experts in California state law – the California Supreme Court – and ask for an interpretation of California law to determine if there is indeed a public performance right in these pre-1972 recordings. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s view of the statute, over a dissent from Justice Antonin Scalia (joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg) that echoed Gorsuch’s non-delegation concerns. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:38 am
On Wednesday, March 22, the eight-justice court will hear argument in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
In a recent size appeal decision, the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals held that a son’s company was affiliated with a company owned by his father because the son had worked for many years at the father’s company, the son’s company leased office space from the father’s company, and the two companies engaged in significant amounts of subcontracting. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:50 am
Appraisers had home offices and provided their own equipment. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:33 am
” Constitution Daily looks at three significant cases on the court’s argument docket next week, which involve “eminent domain, class-action lawsuits, and the immunity of police officers from prosecution. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:47 pm
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals found in favor of Hancock. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
The application was reviewed by a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner, who ultimately determined that there were no conflicting marks that would bar registration of this mark and the application was published for opposition in August of 2016. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
The application was reviewed by a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner, who ultimately determined that there were no conflicting marks that would bar registration of this mark and the application was published for opposition in August of 2016. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
The application was reviewed by a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner, who ultimately determined that there were no conflicting marks that would bar registration of this mark and the application was published for opposition in August of 2016. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
The application was reviewed by a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner, who ultimately determined that there were no conflicting marks that would bar registration of this mark and the application was published for opposition in August of 2016. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:54 am
Following formal disciplinary hearings, a hearing officer sent the transcript and record to the division general manager, who reviewed them and determined that BNSF proved both charges; that the employee engaged in a “serious event of intimidation and harassment” against one employee and threatened another. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:22 am
On Monday, the Court hears arguments in Murr v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
Circuit seeking to intervene in the PHH appeal. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 10:44 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and current Chair of the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Law and National Security. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada said it would investigate, but Satter says he hasn’t heard anything back for 10 months. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 7:55 am
A divided panel of the Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed, and the Colorado Supreme Court affirmed in a 4-3 vote. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 7:55 am
A divided panel of the Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed, and the Colorado Supreme Court affirmed in a 4-3 vote. [read post]
