Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 55,740
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2021, 6:10 am
How to parse one from the other is discussed in Boesky v Levine 2021 NY Slip Op 02059 [193 AD3d 403] April 1, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:24 am
The matter stemmed from a dispute between the Murray and Roberts and trade union AMCU (Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union) referred to the CCMA in which AMCU sought “to be granted organisational rights” as it related to workers of Murray and Roberts at Kusile Power Station. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Concerning SEPs the Executive Order states: To avoid the potential for anticompetitive extension of market power beyond the scope of granted patents, and to protect standard-setting processes from abuse, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce are encouraged to consider whether to revise their position on the intersection of the intellectual property and antitrust laws, including by considering whether to revise the Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Concerning SEPs the Executive Order states: To avoid the potential for anticompetitive extension of market power beyond the scope of granted patents, and to protect standard-setting processes from abuse, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce are encouraged to consider whether to revise their position on the intersection of the intellectual property and antitrust laws, including by considering whether to revise the Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
In Jacobson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
In Arthrex and Collins v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:11 am
Court of Appeal of Brussel, 5 May 2020, Mylan BVBA v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
Whistleblowers are generally speaking truth to the powerful and without strong legal support, the powerful will always squash the powerless. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
(Wealthy business corporations, after all, are hardly certain to always take the side of the Left; one can certainly imagine them using their power in the future against speakers who are anti-capitalist or for that matter just anti-Big-Tech.)[254] The laws target a particular harm, though we can debate how much of a harm it is: large social media corporations' use of their economic power to unduly influence political debate. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
V.) [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
V.) [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
But there is no ongoing control over the person holding that power. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:13 pm
In the case, Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 12:07 pm
Case citation: Russo v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 8:45 am
Also, recall that Trump tried to repeal Section 230 through his executive branch powers via the anti-230 EO. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 8:23 am
First Solar Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 7:15 am
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Consider Lucia v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of Biden v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
