Search for: "SMITH v. STATE"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 10,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
Just the previous week Lord Justice Floyd, who gave the leading judgment in this decision, gave the Herschel Smith Lecture. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 12:15 pm
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog only. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:03 am
A glimpse into that future may be found in Buckley v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:11 pm
In today's Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:45 am
Moreover, all of the panelists agreed that the lack of transparency with respect to who owns the public performance right of a given work is a major problem in the music industry that needs to be resolved.Next, Regan Smith (U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 3:42 pm
When the Supreme Court decided Trump v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
The district court’s order granting summary judgment in Carnes v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 1:25 am
The twitching was erroneous in Rocknroll v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWHC 24 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Mr Justice Briggs last week that had no shake-rattle-and-roll in it at all. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:29 am
And Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 6:01 am
In Huck v. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 4:22 am
German national courts would presumably apply the Sisvel v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:26 am
Right to holiday pay for workers– The Court of Appeal will give its decision in Smith v Pimlico Plumbers on the extent of an employer’s liability to pay for holiday in circumstances where the individual was not paid holiday as a consequence of him being treated as self-employed. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm
Nothing in section 282's text suggests that this standard should be departed from in these circumstances and indeed the Supreme Court has applied the clear and convincing standard irrespective of whether the prior-art evidence has been before the PTO examiner (Smith v Hall).Despite both camps, especially i4i's, extensive policy arguments advancing their respective positions, the Supreme Court stated that the Court was in "no position to judge the comparative… [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:26 am
NEWS: State v. [read post]
