Search for: "State v House" Results 9021 - 9040 of 28,338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2018, 10:17 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
  I found the case of Hilmi & Associates Ltd v 20 Pembridge Villas Freehold Ltd [2010], where a notice was served by leaseholders on a freeholder, notifying that they wanted to purchase the freehold under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
Corp. v JaggerTo view our other blog posts on this topic, please use this link: Nonprimary Residence [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 5:25 pm
  That conclusion appears to rest mainly on one precedent: the Supreme Court’s decision in Powell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 11:50 am by Tom Smith
VIENNA — No one expected much progress from this past week’s diplomatic marathon to defuse the security crisis Russia has ignited in Eastern Europe by surrounding Ukraine on three sides with 100,000 troops and then, by the White House’s accounting, sending in saboteurs to create a pretext for invasion.But as the Biden administration and NATO conduct tabletop simulations about how the next few months could unfold, they are increasingly wary of another set of options for… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 9:25 am
House lawmakers have unanimously approved a bill designed to clamp down on school bullies. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 7:55 pm by Patricia Salkin
Ateres Bais Yaakov Academy of Rockland v Town of Clarkstown, 2023 WL 4340224 (NYAD 2 Dept. 7/5/2023) [read post]
26 May 2015, 5:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Adopt the rule endorsed by a plurality of the Supreme Court in Kuhlmann v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
United States and some miscellaneous examples drawn from congressional records. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:23 am by Administrator
L. 102-88, is introduced in the House by Rep. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:34 pm by Tom Smith
Thanks to the Trump White House and Mitch McConnell’s Senate, there is now a 6-to-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, vetted by conservative legal activists and committed to principles of constitutional interpretation that seem to require sweeping Roe v. [read post]