Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 12,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2011, 12:26 pm
This same position was reiterated in Subash Kumar Mawani v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
I've been on the road this week, so I have just now had a chance to digest the transcript of the oral argument in American Electric Power v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
MORRISON V. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm
However, for an entertaining read which jumps seamlessly from the break up of the Balkans to the modern state of the Unionist v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:11 pm
” But see State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Point Blank Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:57 pm
Amounts less than Cravath, but hey, no state income tax, plus the 3500 square feet and the Lexus.Yet again, the market leader in Texas.But another V&E tipster expressed displeasure:Of course, this is not market, and it hasn’t done much to raise associate morale. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:16 am
See prior post on states suing themselves.Today's decision in Sossamon v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am
Among the reasons frequently cited for the higher incidence of litigation in the United States compared to the rest of the world is the acceptability of contingent fees for plaintiffs’ counsel and general rules that each party to a lawsuit in the U.S. bears its own costs. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:03 pm
The major case in 1981, Cosner v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm
Title: M.B.Z. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm
Sweiss then had a 40-minute arrest that left him in an even worse state. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 12:04 pm
Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:42 am
Neither suggests the state and environmentalist plaintiffs have much chance of prevailing, as even the Court’s most liberal justices seemed skeptical of the arguments in favor of letting these lawsuits proceed, though it is unclear what rationale will attract a majority of the Court. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term: former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
If a case has been relisted once, it generally means that the Court is paying close attention to the case, and the chances of a grant are higher than for an average case. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:22 am
., v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:23 pm
I hope I'll get a chance to go to first principles, but having made that provocative statement, the point is - Justice Scalia: It's like passive activity, right? [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 10:19 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with comments from Eric] Claridge v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:04 am
The case is Virginia v. [read post]
