Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 9021 - 9040 of 9,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
This is the definition that HHJ Dancey was referring to : ‘For the purposes of this practice direction… coercive behaviour’ means an act or a pattern of acts of assault, threats, humiliation and intimidation or other abuse that is used to harm, punish, or frighten the victim; ‘controlling behaviour’ means an act or pattern of acts designed to make a person subordinate and/or dependent by isolating them from sources of support, exploiting their resources and capacities… [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Republicans, unified in their hatred of the president-elect, quickly decided to try to use Trump’s dangerous antics to gain partisan advantage.This was especially surprising, because the election results were rather clear-cut. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The court stated that the object of enactment of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was to make the anti-corruption law more effective and widen its coverage. [read post]
8 Jun 2025, 6:00 am by Gene Takagi
Many nonprofits earn federal funds to deliver vital services to local communities across the country that are often underserved by federal and state governments alike. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  Concomitantly, this means that such nominees are increasingly indifferent, if not outright hostile, to gaining the esteem of those identified with the discredited left. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Do we require financial gain/how do we define financial gain? [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jacob Gersen & Joel Steckel, Harvard Law & NYU Stern, Conference IntroductionSteckel gave a talk on dilution years ago and RT tore him apart (sorry!) [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 2:54 am
Examples: state action doctrine. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm by Howard Knopf
This is not normally how settlements are done – even at the Copyright Board.The deal represents about a 50% (or even an 800% based upon the existing minimum rate) increase over the current rates, which should have gone significantly down rather than up after the 2004 CCH v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am by Brandon Bartels
 The next interesting thing to look out for is what issues beyond Miranda, guns, arbitration, and campaign finance the Chief believes are ripe for conservative gains as the Congress and the Presidency remain in Democratic hands. 3. [read post]