Search for: "State v. South"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 10,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
E-mail: yvonne@tdoa.state.tx.us Texas Department on Aging 4900 North Lamar, 4th Floor Austin, TX 78751-2316 Phone: (512)424-6840; (800) 252-9240 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.tdoa.state.tx.us/index.htm AARP Texas 98 San Jacinto Boulevard, Suite 750 Austin, TX 78701 Phone: (512) 480-9797 Fax: (512) 480-9799 Web: http://www.aarp.org/states/tx ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Disability Law Resource Project 2323 South Shepard Boulevard, Suite 1000… [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
In that closely-watched case, see slip opinion in Caperton v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion… [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:40 am
The claimant was a part-time teaching assistant working principally at schools in east and south east London. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:18 am
When all was said and done, it was a case of “same wine, different bottle” for Defendant and Appellant San Mateo Community College District (“District”) after the First District Court of Appeal’s published May 5, 2017 decision, following remand from the California Supreme Court, in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:28 pm
First, it upheld the law by applying the standard laid down by the Supreme Court in South Carolinz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:47 am
See my discussion of last year’s Ohio Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:21 am
In Sequeira v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:36 pm
In Samantar v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:02 am
” The Pennsylvania experience and the religious tests imposed by states like Maryland, Delaware, South Carolina and Vermont show that “an establishment of religion” forbidden by the Establishment Clause operates as a political faction. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:55 am
Newtown Preservation Society, et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 2:58 am
United StatesCommittee to Protect Journalists v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
: how the case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 3:52 am
Z.B. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:07 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) EU Parliament passes 'Telecom Package' - only judges can order net disconnections (Ars Technica) Extraction and databases - the ECJ rules in Directmedia Publishing GmbH v Albert-Ludwigs- Universität Freiburg (IPKat) Google refuses to submit to Europe's data protection regime (IMPACT) Germany Court tells P2P company RapidShare that it must proactively monitor content for infringement (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) … [read post]
