Search for: "York v York"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 51,499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2010, 12:54 am
Case: Goonan v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:05 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.Seybert v International Group, Inc, ___F.Supp.2d____(E.D. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:39 am
., LLC v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:19 am
McFeeley v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 10:34 am
New York Central Ins. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 8:35 am
Today's advance release family law opinion: Gershon v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 1:06 pm
On May 30, 2024, in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court reversed Cantero v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 9:18 am
Travis D. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 8:03 am
& Extension Bd. v New York State, 2009 NY Slip Op 09591, Decided on December 24, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Suffolk County Fire Academy Vocational Education & Extension Board is a vocational institution [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
Filing an administrative appeal challenging an adverse personnel decision does not toll the statute of limitations for filing a lawsuitSteinberg v Board of Educ. of the City School Dist. of the City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 00201, Decided on January 12, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentMatthew Steinberg challenged his termination during his probationary period from his teaching [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 4:39 pm
Kirby, in which the federal District Court in New York City dismissed counter-claims against Marvel and Disney by which Jack Kirby sought to terminate his transfers of [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 11:21 pm
Who is Who In Kravis & Kravis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:35 pm
The Second Department Reversed. in 2008, the mother relocated from New York to Pennsylvania with the three children to [...] [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:14 am
The essay begins, "For many decades, the Supreme Court's 1905 decision in Lochner v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:40 am
Appealing an administrative decision as provided in a CBA does not toll the Statute of Limitations for filing an Article 78 actionPak v New York City Dept. of Educ., 22 Misc 3d 1117(A)Kifan Pak, a probationary teacher, was told that he would be terminated from his position effective February 28, 2007. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 2:40 pm
News, 2024 Omnibus Law School Specialty Rankings v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:20 pm
More Aftermath of Scalia's Dreadful Oregon v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 9:00 am
On May 18, 2022 in York et al. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 7:40 am
E.g., the New York Times discusses some 2nd Amendment arguments today. [read post]
