Search for: "C N And R" Results 9041 - 9060 of 10,663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Asheesh Agarwal
”[6] In a policy statement from just a few years ago, the FTC agreed that mergers can promote innovation: [I]n dynamic sectors characterized by high R&D costs, firms with broad scale and scope may have unique incentives and capabilities to invest in innovation. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Lexum
Cela a incité la NMCC à lancer récemment un projet de modernisation de son infrastructure. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 10:04 am
Clayton County Judicial Circuit Contact: Nancy Parkhouse, ADR Office, Harold R. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking cases are like an ‘infestation of dandelions’: Zojo Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(Docket Report) District Court C D California: Failure to identify intervening rights during discovery sinks prosecution laches defense: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
 (Gray On Claims) Precedential BPAI opinion rejects functional claim elements as indefinite and not enabled: Ex parte Rodriguez (Patently-O) BPAI issues opinions on four NTP patent re-examinations (12:01 Tuesday) ITC decides not to review ALJ’s grant of Rambus’ summary determination motion that its licensing activities satisfy the domestic industry requirement in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no violation in matter… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Gray On Claims) Precedential BPAI opinion rejects functional claim elements as indefinite and not enabled: Ex parte Rodriguez (Patently-O) BPAI issues opinions on four NTP patent re-examinations (12:01 Tuesday) ITC decides not to review ALJ's grant of Rambus' summary determination motion that its licensing activities satisfy the domestic industry requirement in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no violation in matter concerning probe… [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:33 pm by Harry Cole
 (The particular areas to avoid are spelled out in Section 1.2105(c) of the rules.) [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:20 am by Sheppard Mullin
On the one hand, the Agencies recognized that "[i]n some circumstances, the remedy of an injunction or exclusion order may be inconsistent with the public interest" and "may harm competition and consumers." [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:39 am by Bob Winteringham
  (FYI – According to the NFS, the term “breaking news” is narrowly construed to involve “[a]n event or incident that arises suddenly, evolves quickly, and rapidly ceases to be newsworthy. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:28 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Wendy’s responded to Semenko’s class claims immediately by filing a motion to strike pursuant to Rules 12(f), 23(c)(1)(A), and 23(d)(1)(D). [read post]