Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 9041 - 9060 of 16,596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2013, 9:15 am by Michel-Adrien
The short answer, in my view, is: (a) LAC does not have the power to monetize its collections; (b) LAC can allow (or indeed cannot prevent), others from providing services based on its collections and monetize those services; but (c) LAC cannot grant an exclusive right to monetize the collections'." [read post]
DGCL Section 251(h) does not apply to transactions in which a party to the merger agreement is an “interested stockholder” of the target under DGCL Section203(c) at the time the merger agreement is approved by the target board. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm
INTA does not cover travel expenses". [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
“Just because 9-year-olds can’t vote doesn’t mean the local MP, MPP, or MLA does not represent them when laws about their parents’ split are being improved, stalled, or ignored,” he says. . . . [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Carey was found to be in contempt notwithstanding the Court of Appeal’s findings that “[h]e did not desire or knowingly choose to disobey the order”. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 11:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Q: does copying allow copycats to raise their prices? [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:47 am by Cooper, Adel & Associates
George: "What about eye drops, sleeping pills, Geritol, Preparation-H and Ex-Lax?" [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:52 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
To stress the importance and feasibility of deliberation does not mean, of course, that democracy should consist only of deliberation. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The rule does not say (and does not need to say) what the consequence will be of an applicant not taking the opportunity to restrict the claims. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm by familoo
(see Re H-L (A Child) [2013] EWCA Civ 655 para 3] Or, if you find you respond better to jaunty mantras; as the President says ‘ If in doubt, do without! [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
We will answer those questions and provide the Q&A on our H-1B Visa Lawyer Blog. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:47 am by JP Sarmiento
The USCIS argued that the offered position does not qualify as a “specialty occupation. [read post]