Search for: "Key v State"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 22,474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2017, 1:58 pm
Schaffer v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 9:30 am
And in its 2014 Alice Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 7:36 am
See State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
This summer, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in the Google Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:53 pm
A key takeaway is that while improper or questionable notices are common – one older study found 31% questionable claims, another found 47% — reported rates of counter-notice were typically below 1%. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am
In my case-law travels I’ve come across decisions that catalog prior cases granting dissolution as illustrative categories of disagreement warranting dissolution, e.g., impasse over distributions or the hiring or firing of key personnel, but I’ve seen no attempt to fashion an overall framework for evaluating claims of deadlock, that is, until last month’s opinion in Koshy v Sachdev (read here) in which the Supreme Judicial Court of… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am
In my case-law travels I’ve come across decisions that catalog prior cases granting dissolution as illustrative categories of disagreement warranting dissolution, e.g., impasse over distributions or the hiring or firing of key personnel, but I’ve seen no attempt to fashion an overall framework for evaluating claims of deadlock, that is, until last month’s opinion in Koshy v Sachdev (read here) in which the Supreme Judicial Court of… [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm
Tejas Narechania's new paper, Certiorari, Universality, and a Patent Puzzle, forthcoming in Michigan Law Review argues that a major identifying factor for the Supreme Court's interest in patent cases is a field split: an area where a particular patent law doctrine plays out differently in patent law than in other fields of law where it is used. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
The report ends with specific recommendations to States, business enterprises, civil society organizations and human rights defenders. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2017, 1:09 pm
The recent case Linton v DeSoto Cab Company, Inc., illustrates this very well. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm
A key takeaway is that while improper or questionable notices are common – one older study found 31% questionable claims, another found 47% -- reported rates of counter-notice were typically below 1%. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:21 pm
Harman v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
By defining the key statutory term “waters of the United States,” the rule determines, among other issues, which water bodies are subject to the act’s discharge limitations and permitting requirements. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
Groch v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:32 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
