Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 9041 - 9060 of 21,691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2016, 9:00 am
Calling Defendant's use "a reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation" of its own trademark, Plaintiff states that Defendant's use of HYPERPURE will confuse consumers as to the source of the goods.Plaintiff further contends that Defendant Legend chose the HYPERPURE mark in bad faith in an attempt to associate Defendant's products with Plaintiff's trademark and, in so doing, appropriate the goodwill that Plaintiff has built in the brand. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:03 am
Belmora's FLANAXBased on its reading of the Supreme Court’s Lexmark decision, the lower court had dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States [Bayer], to assert… [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:24 am by Amy Howe
” In The Harvard Law Review, Robert Niles looks at “the doctrinal implications of Reed v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
In The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports on the aftermath of the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Toronto author sends copy of Anne Frank's Diary to German pirate, after copyright complaints https://t.co/ztQfUSf3wv -> Toronto author sends Anne Frank's diary to German politician after copyright complaints https://t.co/9KxvMprXGO -> Google AI gains access to 1.2m confidential NHS patient records https://t.co/TvMC0Tqhcf -> The gavel gamble: Litigation emerges as an asset class https://t.co/mYCrkkQLrG -> Case Law: V v Associated Newspapers Ltd and Ors, Court… [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:36 pm
Daniel EspinosaCircuit Group 34 - Mark Blumstein v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:50 am by Orin Kerr
(In his recent lecture at the Heritage Foundation, starting around the 23 minute mark, co-blogger Randy Barnett makes a somewhat similar argument.) [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:08 am by Amy Howe
The National Immigration Law Center has an explainer on United States v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:05 am
These are themselves creative, and to mark them as infringements would be chilling and stifle creation.State of Mind. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:49 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
If you want a brief example of the court’s approach to these issues look no further than the case of Manchester City Council v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:52 am
The State then published a video recording marked as State's Exhibit 1 . . . to the jury. . . .After the State played the recording from Camera 1,4 Llorens explained that the men arrived at around 8:03 and had left by 8:04:18. [read post]