Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9041 - 9060
of 16,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 3:41 pm
“We don’t think so. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Milhollin, 444 U.S. 555, 568 (1980) (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
This opinion marks another step on a long, legal journey that began when Bahlul was first charged in 2004. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
The law of false marking requires improper marking with the intent to deceive the public. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
The law of false marking requires improper marking with the intent to deceive the public. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:31 am
Mark I. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:31 am
Mark I. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
He’s even alleged to have driven some of his marks out to look at these oil wells that he didn’t own (can’t you see this as a TV movie?). [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 6:02 am
"I don't know. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:01 am
For example, the Washington Post quotes Leon Panetta as explaining, "I don't think there's any question that as a matter of policy it makes a lot of sense to move in that direction, but politically it's a very high hurdle to get over. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 3:20 am
Chatting on twitter with randos isn’t the same thing, no matter how passionately they feel about law. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 11:23 am
If she believes in a case it doesn’t matter to her what the stakes are or how big of a challenge, she will go try the case. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:04 am
Given that it doesn’t cost anything to include a copyright notice and it’s so common and ubiquitous, there isn’t really a reason not to. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
The parties agree that the term "prurient" refers to that which is "marked by or arousing an immoderate or unwholesome interest or desire," especially sexual desire. [read post]
16 Sep 2006, 3:34 pm
Andreopoulous, and Mark A. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:28 pm
McAdams wasn’t sure she had a case until she saw Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, testify before Congress last year that he was responsible for the content on the website. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 5:12 pm
Yesterday we analyzed the government’s lawsuit that seeks to enjoin John Bolton (and, as a practical matter, his publisher and booksellers, too) from publishing or selling his book, “The Room Where It Happened,” and to recover any profits he receives from the book. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
“[T]he Court,” it says, “spent decades scrutinizing state laws and procedures, interpreting arcane statutory provisions, clarifying constitutional standards, reviewing challenges to the methods of execution, in deciding cases that narrowed the application of the death penalty. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:49 pm
However the first thing I read when I opened the email yesterday was the covering letter from Baroness Wilcox who must not have read the Hargreaves Report because she seems to think he dealt with trade marks which we all know he didn't. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech Engineering v Garth Living Pty Ltd (Patentology) (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Prison for infringement of IP rights in Australia! [read post]
