Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 9041 - 9060
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2013, 10:29 am
It doesn’t matter if you are a marijuana farmer with a huge crop for harvest, or a marijuana distributor with lots and lots of product, or a recreational user with a tiny bit of pot in your possession: having any amount of marijuana in your custody or control makes you in violation of Texas criminal law. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Rule 2.72(a)(2) provides that a Section 1(a) applicant may amend the drawing of the mark if "[t]he proposed amendment does not materially alter the mark." [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 12:44 pm
Remember that no matter how much you prepare for a trial -- it usually never goes as planned. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:15 am
Propst also writes there isn’t enough confusion among customers as to who sponsors the paintings. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
With your help, we can show patent trolls that frivolous lawsuits won't be tolerated.Patent trolls are asserting their patents against numerous startups who can’t afford to fight. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Isn’t that what the Affordable Care Act “employer mandate” is all about? [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, heard 9 – 10 December 2013. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 7:42 pm
After Koushal that premature assessment seems wildly off the mark. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 3:01 pm
Stores should anticipate that people need to shop for food, supplies, and other necessities no matter the weather. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
Google doesn’t forget. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
Stever, 603 F.3d 747, 755 (9th Cir.2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:17 pm
” There also was some back and forth about the propriety of deference to the relevant Board of Immigration Appeals ruling, Matter of Wang (2009). [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
No matter what the practice area, there’s a relevant conference. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
Matthew discussed the survey in more depth in his post here: At the trial, “two matters of significance to [the last] appeal occurred,” according to the Second Circuit. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:31 am
” I just don’t see the connection. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
(internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:38 am
Kirby Morgan’s problem is that it doesn’t have a federally famous, household name mark. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am
Listed for two days from Monday 9 December 2013 is the appeal of R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
Case T‑394/10, Elena Grebenshikova v OHIM, Volvo Trademark Holding AB intervening, is a fascinating decision of the General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) on 5 December. [read post]
