Search for: "Million v. Million"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 34,576
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2013, 11:19 am
Investor loss estimate tied to the bond fund sell-off have reached hundreds of millions of dollars. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 6:02 pm
Social media influencers’ posts can attract thousands, and sometimes millions, of views and likes. [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 5:51 am
In one case (United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 9:13 am
” Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
Plaintiff opines that the Premises were worth $25 million on the date of the malpractice based on an unsolicited offer it received within months of the Amendment to purchase one of the two buildings for $11 million and its sale of the other building for $12.5 million, just one month after the November 2016 closing. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 9:47 am
In Danroth v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:41 am
Bell BCI Co. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 8:55 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:47 am
Fehling weighed in on a recent food contamination insurance coverage dispute, Travelers Casualty Insurance Co. of America v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
By Jason Rantanen VirnetX, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:07 am
In Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:19 pm
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:26 am
U.S. and Hill v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:30 am
Jewel v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 10:19 am
In another recent case involving a seat belt, a jury awarded a woman who was paralyzed during a crash $37 million. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:48 am
In the app store context, the Pepper v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
The case name is Express Scripts, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
She is suing on behalf of 45 million Facebook users, claiming that Facebook is abusing its market dominance and forcing users to share their data from non-Facebook products and other Meta-owned platforms, like Instagram. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:28 pm
Then the first jury found patent infringement, patent validity, and damages for a one-time "lump sum" $8 million (as opposed to awarding "running royalty," which presumably would increase PA's damages massively.) [read post]
