Search for: "North v. State" Results 9041 - 9060 of 13,331
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2013, 9:41 pm by Timothy B. Lee
In a Monday court filing for the case formally known as Ingenuity LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:48 am
A North Carolina case decided a few weeks ago had a decidedly happier ending. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:24 am by The Charge
Pacheco, SJC-11216, Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Susan Brenner
Litzinger then called the First Assistant United States Attorney for North Dakota, who said that the VHS tapes were within the scope of the warrant. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
In exempting the ‘slave’ victim from the protection of the common law of battery as the state Supreme Court had done in State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Id. at *10-11.Third, to supply the otherwise missing element of “foreseeability,” Block – relying on Minnesota, rather than North Carolina law – invented a purported “duty to test” never before seen in North Carolina, see Couick v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:21 pm by Eric P. Robinson
This is a new innovation in the United States, with only a few cases like Rio Props. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 4:24 pm by Lorene Park
In Bill v City of North Lauderdale, a federal district court in Florida granted an employer’s motion to dismiss an obese city employee’s complaint that detailed “needlessly cruel” behavior by coworkers (Case No. 12-61342-CIV, March 25, 2013). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Constitutional Right to Seek an Abortion: From Roe to Casey Before the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]