Search for: "People v Favors"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 11,776
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
In Jivraj v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
In Jivraj v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
In Odom v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:20 pm
The people have a right to know who is using their courts. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 2:08 pm
There is a psychology of wine buyers that they will be less concerned about price in favor of free shipping [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm
In the recent case of Bond v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
Viewed in that context, any thought a consumer might have that the words “Havana Club” indicate the geographic origin of the rum must certainly be dispelled by the plain and explicit statements of geographic origin on the label, according to the court.Survey EvidenceThe trial court properly disregarded the survey evidence as immaterial, because the Lanham Act does not forbid language that reasonable people would have to acknowledge is not false or misleading, the court… [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
The fact that his blog got 200,000 visitors per month shows that people can relate to it. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
(Eugene Volokh) That’s the scenario in a 6–1 decision of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court (which comes out in plaintiff’s favor, on the question of whether his case can proceed) in Blackhouse v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:49 am
Hines v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
Citing to Balsam v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:40 am
Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, but the court ruled in Morisch v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 pm
First, Troxel v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:25 pm
That was the case in State of Missouri v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:38 am
Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
Following Judge Sutton’s rejection of the “inactivity” argument, the Supreme Court can take its time
5 Aug 2011, 1:00 pm
Lopez (1995) and United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:55 am
In Mayer v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:15 am
As an aside, both cases were resolved favorably albeit confidentially. [read post]
