Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 27,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
Supreme Court held in Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
State Rep. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 1:41 pm
Not in Farrey v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:38 am
In that case, the court stated: "It appears that once brain death has been determined, by medical diagnosis under Health and Safety Code section 7180 or by judicial determination, no criminal or civil liability will result from disconnecting the life-support devices (see People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:31 am
Khouri (State Taxation – Tobacco)Wilson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:55 am
The amendments are mainly to reflect the Court of Appeal’s decisions in the recent cases of Dawson-Damer and others v Taylor Wessing LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 74 and Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Company Ltd and Deer v University of Oxford [2017] EWCA Civ 121. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:38 pm
Steel Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
When padlocked files are business-critical (e.g. an important intellectual property formula); when encryption cannot be defeated (no matter how good the code-breaker) or when time is of the essence (e.g. when patient data is needed for life-saving surgery), paying the ransom can become the proverbial best worst option. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:27 pm
On July 5, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:08 am
In BHL Boresight, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:06 am
Code Ann. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:43 am
McGuire v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:42 am
Shaver v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:31 am
Plaintiff initially sued Covington and Sewell in State Court for violations of the Texas Insurance Code, among other reasons. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 10:40 am
Khouri (State Taxation - Tobacco)Wilson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
KNAPIK, PLAINTIFF, V. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:36 am
In Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
